Why Financial Terrorism is More Dangerous than Suicide Bombers
Great empires don’t fall at the top of their economic strength. Most empires walk the same road: moral decline followed by economic collapse and then military failure. The morality in our nation is slipping but our economy is still strong… or is it?
Right now, we issue roughly 2-3 Billion dollars in government bonds each day. This is current debt and does not include all of the promises we have made in entitlements to future generations. China has devalued their currency by 40% and so they purchase U.S. Treasury bonds because the Yuan is a bad investment right now. The result of this is that China is putting the money they make off our trade deficit with them back in our economy artificially propping it up. We then spend this going in further in debt.
"The borrower is servant to the lender."
Here is the problem: Bonds garner a lower return than stocks because they are lower risk. If China were to sell their bonds the supply would go up making the cost go down. As the costs go down the investors would sell their high-risk stocks to buy these cheap low risk bonds. What this means is that China could at any time suck billions directly out of our stock market.
If China sold a handful of these bonds (lets say 500 billion) it would cause a catastrophic drop in stock prices AND a drop in the U.S. money supply. This would trigger a panic amplifying the problem all the more. Wall Street would respond to this panic through cost cutting and layoffs. Unemployment would go up causing the economy to continue to go down resulting in an economic tailspin. I could get more technical into the economics of this but in short, this chain of events could cause a depression like we have never seen before as a nation.
Why would China employ the paper nuke? One word: Taiwan . China has been staring longingly at Taiwan for decades. The only thing between China and their prized possession is a U.S. carrier group. Right now, nothing trumps an aircraft carrier militarily except for a nuclear bomb or diplomacy. By threatening with the paper nuke, they can strong arm us out of the South China Sea and seize Taiwan. But why stop there? If they find they can manipulate our sovereignty through finical terrorism then there is no telling where it will stop. How would we fight them since we fund our military with the money they loan us.
Just within the last month, China made their first threat to start selling bonds as leverage in a diplomatic negotiation, interestingly, to protect their trade advantage. If they play their cards right they could trigger a panic by selling only a portion of their bonds and save the rest for leverage. Or better yet keep the bonds as a ransom and just use the threat to undermine our sovereignty.
I am far more concerned by this sophisticated economic attack than I am by the Jihadists who blow themselves up. The only solution to limit China’s economic power over the United States is to eliminate the national debt as quickly as possible. If we don’t get out of debt soon (both as individuals and as a government) our lack of fiscal restraint will be our downfall.
Unfortunately, only one candidate understands this problem. I don’t know if Ron Paul has connected the dots as I have but one of the reasons he gives against the war in Iraq is that, he says, we can’t afford it because to pay for it we have to borrow from the Chinese.
If we feed the lion to fight the tiger, are we better off or just deceived?
Great concise explanation of 1 good reason why USA should adopt a more isolationistic economic & foreign trade ideology: our debate topic in LD values debate this year!
“Feed the lion to fight the tiger.” Cool metaphor. But isn’t China usually referred to as a tiger or a dragon, not a lion? So, it would be the other way around, right? I wonder what animal Ancient Persia is referred to? Humm…. There was Daniel in the lions’ den in Babylon. And there are references to “the beast” from Babylon, such as the mark of the beast, a more current concern.
I would have liked to see some references and links to other articles on this subject. And how many $$ has China loaned to the U.S. Treasury, and other bonds? Surely this information is available somewhere.
As for me and my house, we are trying to stay away from marketable securities for this reason, viz. a viz., this Chinese paper nuke as you refer to it. But it is difficult to own real estate in retirement accounts, they are a real hassle there. But warranty deeds are where it is at in my book, or as your younger brother would put it: “Warranty Deeds, YEAH!”
I hope Ron Paul can get his message out about this Chinese economic absurdity. But for now, this is the status quo, and until we can effectuate change we are continuing to “feed the tiger to fight the lion”, or is it “feed the dragon to fight the beast?”
Great article. You should try submitting a query for this to Christianity Today, or check some of the news-driven Christian publications.
Very Good, Thomas! I can’t believe that we trust the government to take care of us and balance our check-books through government welfare programs when it can’t balance its own. :shakes head: And we’re starting to get concerned about 3rd world countries, when our own back yard isn’t clean. Keep spreading the message. Balance the government!